Home / World / Aadhar linking with PAN: 9-judge Constitution Bench to decide if privacy is a fundamental right

Aadhar linking with PAN: 9-judge Constitution Bench to decide if privacy is a fundamental right

4A nine-judge Constitution Bench will on Wednesday decide if privacy is a fundamental right in response to a batch of petitions raising concerns over linking of Aadhar with PAN – a move  which is being seen as an attempt to dilute civilian liberties.
New Delhi: A nine-judge Constitution Bench will on Wednesday decide if privacy is a fundamental right in response to a batch of petitions raising concerns over linking of Aadhar with PAN – a move  which is being seen as an attempt to dilute civilian liberties.
Importantly, the apex court had nearly 55 years back ruled that privacy is not a basic right for citizens.
While hearing a batch of petitions challenging the Aadhaar scheme, a five-judge bench including Chief Justice of India JS Khehar had yesterday said, “It is essential to decide whether there is right to privacy under the Indian Constitution. We are of the view it has to be decided by a 9-judge bench.”
The Centre argued before the court that the right to privacy is not in the Constitution and is not a part of the right to life, however, the petitioners countered it by saying that the right to privacy is inherent in the Constitution.
The Supreme Court then referred the matter to a nine-judge Constitution Bench to determine whether linking of PAN card with Aadhar breaches an individual’s privacy or not.
The development came days after the apex court briefly stayed the linking of Aadhar to PAN cards amid concerns over breach of privacy.
Responding to it, Centre had then emphatically assured the Supreme Court that biometrics of Aadhar cardholders were safe and had not fallen into other hands.
Through its order, the Supreme Court upheld the validity of an Income Tax Act provision making Aadhar mandatory for the allotment of permanent account number (PAN) cards and the filing of tax returns, but imposed a partial stay on its implementation until a constitution bench addresses the right to privacy issue.
A bench comprising justices AK Sikri and Ashok Bhushan also upheld the legislative competence of Parliament in enacting Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act.
An eight-judge bench in 1954 and six-judge bench in 1962 had both ruled that there is no right to privacy.

Check Also

Sensex falls 184 points, Nifty holds above 10,000

The BSE Sensex fell 184.38 points or 0.54 percent to 34,062.67 in early trade while …

%d bloggers like this: